deep holds what surface hides

 

The Grieving Brain

The Brain’s Battle Between Memory and Reality Beneath Awareness.

Loved ones are deeply wired into our brains, and when they’re gone, it requires a process of rewiring. This is why it hurts so much to know that someone you love is no longer in their physical body. The brain strives to cope with this loss, working to reconcile the deeply ingrained bonds with the harsh reality of their absence.

Following the passing of my mother, I often woke up in the middle of the night, thinking it was time to give her medication, adjust her position to prevent bedsores, or check if she was in pain or still breathing. These sudden awakenings were accompanied by an intense wave of emotion. It took about ten seconds for me to realize that I was in my own bed, in another city, next to my husband. My mother was no longer here. These reminders, though natural and common, made it difficult to adapt to the new reality. They increased my cortisol levels and heart rate in the middle of the night, making it hard to fall asleep again. There was no way to simply push through these thoughts and deal with the aftermath; instead, I had to find a way around them during the times I wasn’t triggered by the memories. This approach allowed these memories to gradually fade and helped me rewire my new reality.


That's when I discovered Mary Frances O'Connor's research on MRI studies of the brain during grief. Her work reveals that the absence of a loved one causes significant disruptions not only in our daily lives but also within our brains. The person who has passed away is literally encoded in our neurons, and when they are gone, the brain must rewire itself to update its understanding of reality compared to what it remembers in its default mode.

O'Connor's research delves into how love shapes our neural pathways. When we form deep emotional attachments to someone, our brains create and strengthen neural connections that are associated with that person. These connections are integral to our sense of identity and security—they form the mental framework through which we navigate our relationships and understand our place in the world.

When we lose someone we love, the brain is suddenly confronted with a significant gap where those connections used to be. It’s not just an emotional void; it’s a neurological one. The brain, which had become accustomed to the presence of this person as part of its “map” of reality, now has to reconcile with their absence. This is a complex process, as the brain must essentially reconfigure its neural network to reflect a world in which this person no longer exists.

The grief we experience is a reflection of the brain’s efforts to adjust to this new reality, to find a way to move forward despite the profound loss in our reality.

O'Connor suggests that this process of neurological adaptation is best navigated through the very same mechanism that initially formed the attachment—love. Just as love helped create those deep neural bonds, it can also help to heal and rewire the brain in the aftermath of loss. In this sense, grief is not just an expression of loss; it is a testament to the power of love. It is through love that we form connections, and it is also through love that we eventually learn to live with their absence. Grief, then, is a byproduct of love—an inevitable part of the process of caring deeply for another person. It is a natural and necessary step in the brain's journey to reconcile the past with the present and to find a way forward into the future.

We often think of the brain as a single entity, but it’s actually a complex network of systems. One key system is the memory center, where we recall moments spent with our loved ones. This part of the brain acknowledges the reality that they are no longer physically present and remembers the moment of their passing. But there’s another system deeply rooted in the neurobiology of attachment.

To understand the impact of loss, we first need to explore what happens when we bond with someone. When a relationship is formed, the bond is encoded in specific regions of the brain, creating a powerful belief: “I will always be there for you, and you will always be there for me.” This attachment becomes automatic, ingrained in our neural pathways. It’s what sustains our expectations—like knowing our partner will be home when we return from work or trusting that our children will come back after school. These beliefs function seamlessly as long as our loved ones are alive.

However, when a loved one dies, the attachment system—the part of the brain that holds onto the belief in the permanence of the bond—doesn’t immediately adapt to the new reality. This part of the brain continues to send signals that they’re still out there, and we can often still sense their presence, as if they were just in the next room.

This creates a profound internal conflict. The memory system understands they are gone, while the attachment system stubbornly holds onto the belief that they’re still with us. These two streams of information—one grounded in the reality of their absence, the other in the belief of their presence—are in direct opposition, causing the brain to struggle to reconcile them. This conflict between reality and attachment can lead to significant emotional distress as we navigate the painful process of accepting their loss. 

The brain, often described as a prediction machine, constructs our sense of reality based on these predictions—or at least, so we believe. It relies on patterns and past experiences to forecast what will happen next, creating a sense of stability and continuity in our lives. However, when it comes to death, this predictive capacity faces a significant challenge.

The problem lies in how we are conditioned from a young age. There is very little dialogue about death in our formative years, and as a result, our brains don’t develop a clear framework for understanding or predicting what death truly means in our reality. This lack of early conversation and preparation leaves us with vague and unstructured notions of loss. So when we are confronted with the death of a loved one, the brain struggles to reconcile this new, harsh reality with its previous, incomplete understanding.

The brain’s predictions, which once constructed a seemingly solid reality, now falter as it tries to grasp the permanence of loss. Without a structured, clear encoding of what death means, we are left navigating a world where our expectations no longer match our experiences. This disconnect adds another layer of difficulty to the grieving process, as the brain must not only cope with the emotional upheaval but also rewire itself to understand and accept a reality that it was never fully prepared to predict.

When a person dies, the brain undergoes a significant transformation, requiring it to physically rewire itself to adapt to the new reality. This process involves altering the connections between neurons and changing how proteins are folded. It is a demanding task for the brain, one that is both time-consuming and mentally exhausting due to the brain's high energy demands. Grief places an extraordinary strain on the brain as it works to regroup, recode, and re-evaluate deeply ingrained patterns of thought and behavior.

The challenge of this adjustment is intensified by the fact that our closest relationships are deeply embedded in the brain’s reward system, which motivates us to seek and enjoy the presence of our loved ones. When someone we care about dies, this reward system doesn’t simply shut down; it continues to drive a longing for connection, making the experience of loss feel deeply disorienting. Grief, therefore, is not merely an additional stressor but a disruption to something fundamental to our identity and emotional balance.

To adapt, the brain needs time to rewire itself—time spent navigating a world without our spouse, child, best friend, or parent. The Nobel Prize-winning research by Edvard I. Moser and May-Britt Moser, who identified "object-trace cells" involved in memory formation, supports the idea that our neural networks must reorganize to accommodate new realities. Although we cannot directly observe single neurons in humans, the principles discovered by the Mosers highlight how the brain must adjust its internal architecture to process and integrate the loss.

This process of neurological rewiring is a literal, physical change that takes place over time, reflecting the brain’s remarkable plasticity. Grieving, then, is not just an emotional journey but a profound neurological one, where the brain must rebuild its understanding of the world in the absence of a loved one. This transformation underscores the complexity of grief and the significant energy required to reconcile our internal world with the new reality.

In the midst of grief, our thoughts, feelings, and actions can make us feel like we’re losing our minds. But understanding why our brain reacts this way can help us be more patient with ourselves. Grieving is a form of learning, and learning takes time and experience. Our brain is doing its best to help us adapt.

However, grief is not only an emotional response; it’s also a physiological one. As Candace Pert’s research into the mind-body connection suggests, our emotions are not confined to our brains but are distributed throughout our bodies, influencing our physiological state. When we experience grief, this connection becomes particularly evident.

Heart rate often increases, and stress hormones like cortisol surge, triggering the body’s fight-or-flight response. This heightened state of arousal can make it difficult to eat, sleep, or concentrate. The body remains on high alert, as if bracing for an imminent threat, even though the danger is internal and rooted in loss. This off-balance feeling is not just a psychological experience; it’s a physiological disruption that can throw our entire system out of sync.

This mind-body connection means that grief is felt in every part of us, not just in our thoughts or emotions. It’s why we might experience a literal ache in our chest or feel physically drained when grieving. Our immune system can also be affected, making us more susceptible to illness as our body devotes resources to managing the stress of loss.

When a person dies, the brain undergoes a significant transformation as it rewires itself to adapt to the new reality. Beyond this rewiring, the brain also maintains a "closeness index" for the people in our lives, which is regularly updated based on our interactions. This index plays a crucial role in how the brain processes the significance of our relationships. When someone close to us passes away, the brain must adjust this index, which can be mentally overwhelming.

The bonds we form with loved ones create lasting neural connections, and these connections persist even after they are gone, influencing our neural architecture and even our DNA through epigenetic changes. Grief, then, is the cost of loving deeply—a cost directly tied to the depth of that love. This enduring presence of love within our neural networks highlights the “gone-but-also-everlasting” paradox. To help the brain cope with grief, we must use that very love to update its understanding of the world.

Unlike the linear progression suggested by traditional models, grief is a continuous, non-linear journey that reflects the ongoing interplay between our memories, our love, and the evolving reality of loss. This understanding underscores the complex, yet essential, role that love plays in helping the brain navigate the profound changes that grief demands.

Time, coupled with immersive experiences, plays a crucial role in helping the brain adapt to life after loss. While it may be painful to revisit old places or reconnect with familiar faces, these are the very experiences our brain needs to update its understanding of the world as it is now. These moments, though challenging, push the brain to reconcile the absence of a loved one with the present reality, facilitating the gradual integration of loss.

By approaching these experiences with love, we can transform our grief into a new skill—a different facet of the same emotion. The love we had for the person doesn’t vanish; it evolves. Revisiting memories and places with love in mind enables our brain to hold both the pain of loss and the enduring presence of love. This duality helps us navigate grief, gradually allowing us to find a new balance in a world that has changed.

Understanding that this process will be difficult for a time is essential as our brain works to update its internal model of reality. A loving relationship leaves a permanent imprint on the brain, meaning that even after a loved one has passed, they remain with us in the physical traces within our neural networks. This enduring connection, woven into the very fabric of our brain, allows us to continue loving and remembering them in new ways, helping us to adapt to a world where their physical presence is no longer a part.

 
 

When my mother passed, the overwhelming sadness didn’t descend upon me as I had anticipated. Having been by her side in those final days, I realized that grief had already begun its quiet work, weaving itself into my heart long before her last breath. We were, in our own way, already navigating the gentle transition from life to memory, preparing for a world where her presence would be felt in absence.

If someone were to ask what grief has taught me, I would say it begins long before the final goodbye and lingers, winding through time in ways that are both surprising and profound. Like love, grief is not linear; it does not follow a straight path, nor does it ever truly come to an end. It is a burden that is both heavy and precious, something I carry with a deep sense of reverence —both within me and in the world around me.

As I reflect on this journey, my thoughts often return to a character from Thomas Mann’s The Magic Mountain—a Mexican mother, "Tous-les-Deux," who has lost one son and is on the brink of losing another. She stands in a foreign land, surrounded by people who cannot understand her sorrow, yet her grief is unmistakable, transcending the barriers of language and culture. In her silent struggle, I see a reflection of my own—a grief that is deeply personal, yet universally shared by all who have loved and lost.

Join Our Newsletter 

 

If you felt something stir, don’t stop here.

Subscribe to the newsletter—where your energy finds fuel, and your radical voice finds home.